Warrior Mohammed

In  a recent spate of local newspaper articles, an argument developed as to whether Islam is a religion of peace. It’s an interesting question because modern Muslims want us to believe, as they do, that it is indeed a religion of peace and that they hold peace as a goal.

But there are problems.

First of all, what is a religion of peace? Jesus is often portrayed as the Prince of Peace, and yet he was not a peaceful man. He was an apocalyptic street preacher and his pronouncements were not all that peaceful. His own testament that he came not to bring peace but the sword should be clear enough, in spite of all the other things he was supposed to have said.

And Christianity over the centuries has been anything but peaceful. The Hebrew predecessors were anything but peaceful, living in the shadow of warrior cultures. Their contrived mythologies not only describe constant war and conflict, but glorify it.

Islam was born in the midst of the Quraysh tribe, worshipers of multiple gods and loosely affiliated. Mohammed is credited with uniting the tribes under the banner of Islam. From the modern perspective, Mohammed was not only a warrior, but a vicious one. His illustrious military career began with a series of attacks on caravans.

It seems a joyful thing to Muslims that the badly outnumbered troops of Mohammed were so victorious, but picture throwing weapons such as slings and arrows launched from cover. This is tantamount to modern roadside bombs or suicide bombers – one life spent to slaughter many.

Mohammed was able to finance his operations with the proceeds of the caravans. His followers were given impetus by the promise of women, slaves, and wine in the afterlife, and were enjoined to never make friends of Jews or Christians. The Quraysh sent a thousand men against Mohammed and he was soundly routed and nearly killed. So much for the success of a prophet.

Some little tidbits: Mohammed told his men that it was all right to lie because anything done for the cause was just. Mohammed made a bargain with the Quraysh after praying in his cave and said that it was all right to worship the Quraysh gods for a year and then the Quraysh would worship Allah for a year, but he reneged on the bargain after more prayer and declared that the first dream was the work of Satan. Isn’t it delightful that one cannot tell the difference between visitations of the Angel Gabriel and Satan?

At the end of his life, having no male successors, his followers were conflicted as to whom should lead the Muslim adherents when Mohammed was gone. One would think that Gabriel might have warned of this. The result was that the religion split into the Sunni and Shia sects before the body was cold. These sects have fought with each other for the last 1,400 years.

After the U.S. incursion into Baghdad, the lack of a strong, authoritative leader let slip the dogs of sectarianism and the internal strife soon overwhelmed the external threat. Without Saddam’s strong hand, the enmity of the Shia sect, the Sunni sect and the hated Kurds were all at each others’ throats. Peaceful?

When he attacked Medina, Mohammed desired to kill all the Jews there. He was dissuaded by the Hypocrites, people who were not Muslim but were bound by Muslim dictates and followed them loosely. But in the Battle of the Trench, he beheaded between 600 and 900 Jews, many with his own hand.

It is difficult to understand how, with the attitude of this godly messenger, any peaceful adjectives could be applied to him, but as in many other religions peace is a quality the group wishes as an ideal for itself more than for its opponents. Muslims are enjoined to help the poor and downtrodden, but as with most religious groups, it really helps to be Muslim poor. While Europe was wallowing in the Dark Ages (no longer as dark as they once were) Muslim lands enjoyed good commerce, lighted streets, and education, including the first universities. Good for Muslims, mostly. They are credited with preserving knowledge that would have been lost to the world and it was rediscovered by the west in the Renaissance. It was good to be a Muslim.

Today, the misogynistic power of such cults as the brutal Kingdom of the Sauds, fed by the power of black gold, defies logic. Power indeed corrupts. The ignorance of the Muslim Sudan, where Christian boys are kidnapped and forced to learn the Quran  and girls are sexually maimed is a perfect example of precisely how religion poisons everything.

The lack of structure in the Muslim faith provides no brake on excesses done in the name of the Prophet. Any person can issue a fatwa. Consider the OAC’s threats against Denmark when attempting to gain political power there, that they would burn all the Danish embassies around the world if they did not get their way. Consider the sentences of death against cartoonists, Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hussein Ali, and any number of world figures who have either opposed Islam or spoken out against it, or even committed some faux pas that some Muslims found offensive.

Islam means ‘submission,’ and they wish everyone to submit. Everyone. In some parts of the world, this is beat into them at the end of a whip at a tender age.

I have not spoken to the provenance of the Qur’an, which Muslims will assure you is the true words of Mohammed as given him by Gabriel, and I’ll leave that to others for now. The historical events herein are primarily from the BBC and I invite anyone to read their descriptions of the life and times of the Prophet. Other information given is from readily available news sources. My opinions, sclerotic though they may be, are my own, and I trust that I have established that describing Islam as a religion of peace is pushing the envelope of reason. One hopes that those of the Islamic faith will continue to live peacefully and that they will speak out as one against the brutal liberties taken by those who would enact horrific vengeance against those whom they perceive as enemies, such as the innocent victims of the Twin Towers massacre.

And please keep in mind that I have barely touched upon either the historical data or the modern-day events and I hope that I have portrayed them honestly.


About herkblog

I'm an atheist. Although that's just a part of my life, I consider it to be important enough to me to be the main theme of this personal screed. I am self-employed in a service business and I live in Idaho, a place not known for its liberal qualities.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Warrior Mohammed

  1. The only reasonable interpretation I can make of “religion X is a religion of peace”, regardless of what religion X might be, is that whomever is saying that has found some peaceful things about that religion. They are practicing it or have seen others practicing that religion in a peaceful way. They are ignoring or at least discounting some or all of the current and historical practices and the potential practices and uses or abuses of the scripture and it’s interpretations.

    Having lived a few years in the “I know Christianity has been responsible for many things, but I know how to do it right” camp, it is a difficult trap to get out of. Only sociopaths do things that they believe are wrong and don’t worry about justification. The rest of us justify our actions and even when found wrong, find it difficult to admit it. For me, the hardest thing to let go of was that death was the end. After a few decades all the DVDs with my image will start to degrade, and at some point, my blogs, posts and comments will be erased.

    As I get older, I’m getting more and more comfortable with letting it all go. I still live as if I should leaves things better than I found them, but I’m looking forward to a time when I won’t have to deal with it, when there is nothing left of me to even care.

  2. herkblog says:

    There are actually some mostly peaceful religions. I do not know if they would all remain peaceful should they grow large enough to have serious power. But the Abrahamic religions are based in brutal cultures from harsh conditions and although most people want peace there is too much temptation to overwhelm others for their resources.

    As to altruism, mammals have it. Even rodents show empathy. Humans are a particularly social species and we would not be here at all if we didn’t help each other. We all contribute to society in some way.

    From the solipsist point of view, nothing matters. Eventually, the sun will destroy this planet and galaxies will collide. But we don’t live in eternity, we live in the here and now. Practically speaking, we don’t have to leave a legacy, but we can – some people will likely be read or viewed thousands of years from now. Your DVDs may degrade, but the data can be moved and retained in other formats. If the information is important enough or memorable enough, someone may seek to preserve it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s